HLC 2026 Reaffirmation of Accreditation
HLC 2026 Reaffirmation of Accreditation
Accreditation is an external review and assessment process that ensures the quality of an institution of higher learning. This process verifies that the institution meets rigorous standards and engages in continuous improvement. The institutional evaluation includes the soundness of its governance and administration, adherence to mission, financial sustainability, and resource availability. All degree levels are subject to the accreditation process.
The accrediting body of Wartburg College is the Higher Learning Commission (HLC), one of six regional nongovernmental agencies that accredit degree-granting colleges and universities in the U.S. The HLC is recognized by the U.S. Department of Education and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA).
The HLC offers different pathways to accreditation. Wartburg College is on the Open Pathway, which involves several stages in a 10-year cycle. Our reaffirmation of accreditation will take place in 2026. It will require a comprehensive evaluation.
The accreditation process ensures that institutions are delivering on their promises to students for a superior education, maintaining fiscal responsibility, and using resources wisely. Consequently, the different stages of evaluation allow us to recognize and celebrate our successes and identify areas for further improvement. Further, accreditation by HLC is required for many forms of federal funding, including some financial aid for students. It also informs transfer students and graduate and professional schools that the degrees students received at Wartburg College meet federal standards of quality.
In 2026, Wartburg College will have its comprehensive evaluation. The purpose of the evaluation is to ensure that we are meeting the Criteria for Accreditation, engaging in institutional improvement, and complying with specific federal requirements. This evaluation is a requirement for our reaffirmation of accreditation, which we last received in 2017. The comprehensive evaluation consists of the following components:
1. Assurance Review
For the Assurance Review, we will submit an Assurance Argument that demonstrates that we have met the Criteria for Accreditation through the use of supporting evidence. Prior to the on-site visit, the external peer review team, which consists of full-time faculty and administrators who are well-trained in the HLC criteria and federal compliance requirements, reviews the document and accompanying evidence.
Specifically, the format of the Assurance Argument as defined by HLC is as follows:
“In the Assurance Argument, the institution demonstrates how it meets each Criterion and Core Component. For each Criterion, the institution offers:
The Assurance Argument will link to materials the institution uploads to its Evidence File to further support its narrative for each Criterion and Core Component.”
2. Federal Compliance Review
This review demonstrates that we are meet our Title IV program responsibilities and comply with specific regulations required by the US Department of Education. In order for the college to be eligible for federal financial aid, we must demonstrate compliance with these federal requirements. As a federally recognized accrediting agency, HLC is charged with conducting this review.
3. Student Opinion Survey
Approximately two months before the on-site peer review visit, HLC will administer an online student opinion survey. The survey provides our students with the opportunity to participate in the evaluation process and to help peer reviewers identify potential areas for further inquiry during their visit.
4. On-site Peer Review Visit
On-site visits are conducted by a peer review team, consisting of faculty and administrators from other higher education institutions and who are trained by HLC. The visit occurs after it reviews the assurance argument, the federal compliance report, and the student opinion survey. The team cooperates with the institution to create the agenda for the visit, which usually includes meetings with the institution’s leadership and board, as well as open forums with faculty, staff and students. The team’s job is to validate and confirm that we have met the criteria for accreditation. Visits typically last 1 1/2 days.
Dan Walther – Chair
Joy Becker
Rachel Clark
Sean Coleman
Kathleen Sihler
Sarah Voels
Sally Malcolm
Criteria for Accreditation
Disclaimer: HLC is currently reviewing these and will be updated once the new criteria and core components are finalized in June.
The Higher Learning Commission (HLC) uses five criteria to evaluate institutions of higher education for accreditation or reaffirmation of accreditation. For convenience, we have copied them below.
The institution’s mission is clear and articulated publicly; it guides the institution’s operations.
Core Components
1.A. The institution’s mission is articulated publicly and operationalized throughout the institution.
1.B. The institution’s mission demonstrates commitment to the public good.
1.C. The institution provides opportunities for civic engagement in a diverse, multicultural society and globally connected world, as appropriate within its mission and for the constituencies it serves.
The institution acts with integrity; its conduct is ethical and responsible.
Core Components
2.A. The institution establishes and follows policies and processes to ensure fair and ethical behavior on the part of its governing board, administration, faculty and staff.
2.B. The institution presents itself clearly and completely to its students and to the public.
2.C. The governing board of the institution is autonomous to make decisions in the best interest of the institution in compliance with board policies and to ensure the institution’s integrity.
2.D. The institution is committed to academic freedom and freedom of expression in the pursuit of truth in teaching and learning.
2.E. The institution’s policies and procedures call for responsible acquisition, discovery and application of knowledge by its faculty, staff and students.
The institution provides quality education, wherever and however its offerings are delivered.
Core Components
3.A. The rigor of the institution’s academic offerings is appropriate to higher education.
3.B. The institution offers programs that engage students in collecting, analyzing and communicating information; in mastering modes of intellectual inquiry or creative work; and in developing skills adaptable to changing environments.
3.C. The institution has the faculty and staff needed for effective, high-quality programs and student services.
3.D. The institution provides support for student learning and resources for effective teaching.
The institution demonstrates responsibility for the quality of its educational programs, learning environments, and support services, and it evaluates their effectiveness for student learning through processes designed to promote continuous improvement.
Core Components
4.A. The institution ensures the quality of its educational offerings.
4.B. The institution engages in ongoing assessment of student learning as part of its commitment to the educational outcomes of its students.
4.C. The institution pursues educational improvement through goals and strategies that improve retention, persistence and completion rates in its degree and certificate programs.
The institution’s resources, structures, and processes are sufficient to fulfill its mission, improve the quality of its educational offerings, and respond to future challenges and opportunities.
Core Components
5.A. Through its administrative structures and collaborative processes, the institution’s leadership demonstrates that it is effective and enables the institution to fulfill its mission.
5.B. The institution’s resource base supports its educational offerings and its plans for maintaining and strengthening their quality in the future.
5.C. The institution engages in systematic and integrated planning and improvement.
For questions regarding the accreditation at Wartburg College, contact Dr. Daniel Walther, associate dean for accreditation.