EC243:  THE FEDERAL RESERVE

May 2002

 

Instructor:  Scott Fullwiler, Ph.D.                                                         Email: fullwiler@wartburg.edu

Time and Place:  Daily 9-12, WBC 214                                                Office:  WBC 109

Office Hours:  by appointment                                                             Phone:  352-8452

 

 

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

From the catalog:  Guiding principles, strategies, and tactics of the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy within political, historical, and theoretical contexts.  Includes trip to a regional Federal Reserve Bank.  Prerequisite:  EC 141.

 

Monetary policy has during the past 20 years become (for better or worse) the primary tool of macroeconomic stabilization in many countries, including the US.  Indeed, every four years we may be electing only the second most powerful person in the country; the most powerful person may very well be the unelected Chair of the Federal Reserve.  This course begins by going through how the Fed views the economy, then describing how it formulates its policy, strategy, and tactics from this.  Special attention is paid to how the Fed’s formulation of these has been shaped by debates in economic theory and actual economic events.

 

As with any course that lasts only 3-4 weeks, the pace of the course will be brisk.  Each day of class should be considered to be analogous to nearly one full week in a normal semester (probably a bit less, but you get the idea).  In order to keep up, you will need to do 2-3 hours of reading or other work—at least—EACH DAY.  Likewise, missing class will set you substantially behind very quickly—do not expect to earn a good grade if you miss more than one or two classes.

 

A note on prerequisites:  You are expected to have a basic understanding of EC 141.  If you do not recall some of this material when it arises, then it is your responsibility to bring yourself up to date, not mine.  There is a natural progression to the material covered throughout the business curriculum, and it simply must be expected that you have taken basic knowledge with you from these courses (just as in progressions through a foreign language or a math curriculum, for instance).

 

REQUIRED MATERIALS:

1.       Carolyn Clark.  Monetary Policy in Theory and Action.  Unpublished manuscript.

2.       Ann-Marie Meulendyke.  U.S. Monetary Policy and Financial Markets.  Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 1998.

3.       M.A. Akhtar.  Understanding Open Market Operations.  Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 1997.

4.       Several other readings will be distributed in class or can be found on the Internet.

 

COURSE GRADES:

The following table lists the course work and weighting for the term:

 

                                    Item                                                                  Weight

                        Participation                                                                     15%

                        Clark Assignments (6)                                                      18%

                        Article Write-Ups (5)                                                       21%

                        Essay Questions (5)                                                          21%

                        Final Exam                                                                       25%

                                                                                                              100%

 

All decimals on final grades in each category listed above will be rounded up (e.g., a score of 79.3% will be rounded up to 80%).  However, your cumulative grade for the course will not be rounded up or down (e.g., a course average of 79.999% will receive a final grade of C+).

The following scale will be used in assigning grades:

 

93% and above    A                         80% to 82.9%      B-                 67% to 69.9%      D+

90% to 92.9%      A-                       77% to 79.9%      C+                 63% to 66.9%      D

87% to 89.9%      B+                       73% to 76.9%      C                   60% to 62.9%      D-

83% to 86.9%      B                         70% to 72.9%      C-                 Below 60%          F

 

All decimals on final grades in each category listed above will be rounded up (e.g., a score of 79.3% will be rounded up to 80%).  However, your cumulative grade for the course will not be rounded up or down (e.g., a course average of 79.999% will receive a final grade of C+).

 

PARTICIPATION:

Participation grade in the course will be determined from the following sources:

·      Attendance will be taken each day in class and at all events in Chicago.  Missing an event in Chicago without an excused absence will substantially reduce your participation grade.

·      Certain class activities (May 3, for example) will require substantial class participation for success—the quality of your participation in these activities will affect your participation grade.

·      Your level of preparation for each day of class.

·      The quality AND quantity of your overall participation in class—through asking questions, providing answers to questions posed, and contributing to discussions.

 

Excused absences are given at my discretion and include Wartburg athletic and other official Wartburg College events.  In these circumstances, you must provide me with documented proof before an exam takes place or homework is due.  Sickness, deaths in the family, and other tragedies can be excused when some form of proof is provided (such as a doctor’s note).  Most other reasons for absence will not be excused.

 

ASSIGNED WORK:

Final Exam:  The final exam will take place on the last day of class.  I will give you a study guide in advance to alert you to what will be covered on the exam.  The final exam will be open note, though not open book.

 

Clark Questions:  Questions and terms will be assigned from the ends of chapters in Clark.  Your answers will be graded BOTH on correctness/accuracy AND completeness.  Attempting to get by with as little effort as possible will reduce total points received since work will be incomplete.  There will be work assigned from each chapter in Clark, but you will be required to do only 6 (six) of these assignments.  You can do more of them if you like, and then have only the highest six count towards your grade.

 

Essay Questions:  I have attached a list of questions that pertain to the material in the course and due dates.  There are many questions there, and some more may be added.  You are to choose five (5) of these to answer as completely as possible.  You must choose at least 2 from material before and 2 from material after the Chicago trip.  Expected length is around 500 words for each.  These must be typed.  Grammar, spelling, etc., count.  If you do more than 5, I will count only the best 5 toward your grade.

 

Regarding both Clark Questions and Essay Questions, there is quite a bit of detail involved in the material for the course; therefore, it cannot possibly be completely comprehended if effort is not forthcoming.  This, however, does not mean that the longest answer is the best answer—it is VERY difficult to qualitatively improve economic analysis simply by adding words.

 

Article Write-ups:  There are many articles that we will read to get an understanding of theoretical debates or the Fed’s views.  You are required to do write-ups of five (5) articles listed on the course outline.  Those items with a star (*) next to them are possible for write-ups.  Write-ups MUST be typed and ready to be handed in during class on the date that the material is covered (grammar, spelling, etc., count).  An exception is made for those covered during the first week of class—one of these must be handed in by the end of the first week, while any others from this material can be handed in Monday, May 13 by 5pm.   You must do at least 2 from material before the trip and at least two 2 from material after the trip.  You may also do a write-up of up to 7 articles and have only the 5 highest count towards your grade. 

 

The basic requirement of the write-up is to explain the logic of the argument being made in the article.  More points will be given if you can explain how and where the author’s arguments fit into what is being covered in class (note:  this entails more than simply explaining “that” it is related).  Write-ups must be typed and should be about 500 words in length (one side of one page, single-spaced).  Please note that these are not opinion pieces—you do not know enough about this material to have an opinion yet (in some cases, neither do I)—you are simply explaining the author’s arguments.

 

NOTES ON MY POLICY/VIEWS ON ASSIGNED WORK:

1.       Regarding late work, it is not possible to grade consistently, or be fair to people who take trouble to do assignments on time, if I am absorbing a continual stream of late work.  Therefore, late assignments will be penalized 20% (of the total possible grade) up to the first 24 hours they are late; 40% thereafter.  However, once I have either provided the class with answers or have returned an assignment, late work will no longer be accepted.  It is your responsibility to organize your life so work can be done on time—if you leave it until the last minute and then something breaks down, that’s your problem.  Please do not tell me about malfunctioning disks, printers, and so forth. 

 

2.       All work is due in class at the moment that I choose to collect it (which could be the beginning, middle, or end of class).  An assignment is considered late if it is not handed in at such time, unless other arrangements have already been made.  If you have an excused absence on a day that an assignment is due, it will be accepted without penalty only on the first class you attend after the absence, unless other arrangements have already been made.

 

3.       ALL assignments are done by you (and nobody else) with no help or collaboration whatsoever unless EXPLICITLY allowed in writing by me.  This means that you cannot defend yourself after the fact by claiming that I did not explicitly prohibit such activity on any assignment.

 

4.       When doing homework, writing that you do not understand something is completely unacceptable and receives no points.  After college, doing a report or a project without finding out what is expected can result in termination of employment.  Better to learn how to ask questions now.  Many assignments are purposely geared to require extensive thought and organization.  There will always be time available for questions in class if you have them—take advantage of this.  Of course, just like real world employment, you will also be expected to put things together yourself without needing to be hand fed every detail, so there will be limits to how much help I will give in order to encourage you to work things out yourself.

 

So, NEVER write (at least in this class) “the article was confusing” or “I did not completely understand” or some variant thereof.  There are certainly times to point out that you do not understand something (i.e., well before an assignment is due is most appropriate) and sometimes during your career things you must read will not be very coherent.  However, in this class every assigned reading WILL be coherent (whether you recognize it or not).

 

IMPORTANT HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS:

1.       Academic Integrity/Honesty:  Academic integrity is one of the basic principles of a college community. By attending Wartburg College, students are demonstrating their dedication to the Honor Code.  The Honor Code reminds students of their responsibility to promote academic honesty by opposing cheating and plagiarism and reporting dishonest work.  All assigned work will be done independently unless otherwise specified and will be original.  Any form of academic dishonesty will result in one or more of the following sanctions:  a) loss of points for that specific assignment or exam; b) reduction in the final course grade; c) issuance of a grade of “F” for the entire course.

2.       Commitment to Students with Disabilities:  Wartburg College seeks to maintain a supportive academic environment for students with disabilities.  To ensure their equal access to all educational programs, activities, and services, Federal law requires that students with disabilities notify the College, provide documentation, and request reasonable accommodations.  If you need accommodations in this course, please notify the Dean of Students (Dr. Alexander Smith, Luther Hall 206, 352-8260, lex@wartburg.edu).

3.       Harassment:  Everyone in the class will conduct themselves in a mature and professional manner.  I will not, nor will Wartburg College, tolerate any form of harassment in the classroom (including, but not limited to, harassment related to gender, race, or lifestyle).  If you have a complaint, please bring it to my attention or to the attention of the Dean of Students (Dr. Alexander Smith, Luther Hall 206, 352-8260, lex@wartburg.edu).

4.       Incompletes:  Incompletes will be given only in rare cases of extreme personal or familial difficulties that prevent a student from completing the semester’s work, and in those cases only if the student has a passing grade (C- or better) and has completed a substantial percentage of the course.

5.       Extra Credit:  You should expect that there will be no opportunities for extra credit during the semester.  In particular, there will be absolutely NO opportunities for extra credit on an individual basis, as this would be unfair to others in the class.  Rather than hoping for extra credit opportunities, take responsibility for your performance in the course throughout the semester by following the advice provided above.

 

REACHING YOUR POTENTIAL IN THIS COURSE:

Your grade is your responsibility; I only assign a grade—you earn the grade yourself.  Though I have substantial responsibilities as instructor of the course that I take very seriously,  your success in this class is far more a function of your effort than mine.  It is imperative that you honestly assess your own performance and determine where improvements can be made throughout the semester.  Your performance will derive from a combination of (1) your own aptitude for the course material, and (2) the quantity and quality of effort you expend learning the course material.  Regarding the latter, what follows is my best advice to you on your approach to this class.

1.       Attend Class:  Those who frequently miss my class almost always do poorly.  Notes copied from other students are most often not a good substitute for class time missed.

2.       Be Prepared:  Keep up with the coursework.  Do at least two hours of study outside of class for every hour in class (this is a College-wide minimum expectation and translates to 6 hours of study per week outside of class for this course alone).  The material in this course is cumulative, and most are not able to “catch up” later in the semester.  Go over your notes and relevant reading shortly after each class to make sure you understand them.  If you don’t understand something, then you have a good question to ask me!  Do homework conscientiously and in a timely manner.

3.       Learn to Solve Problems:  More than just the study of the economy or businesses, economics and finance are ways of thinking that involve logical reasoning and attention to detail.  This is difficult for many to pick up at first.  If you are unfamiliar with this method, you will need to practice (a lot!) if you expect to be successful.  It is extremely important that you practice solving problems covered in class or in the book, in addition to studying concepts and facts.  Most problems have obvious variations, which you should also practice since you are more likely to see these on an exam.

4.       Ask Questions Often, and Be Receptive to the Answers:  You will have questions—but I don’t know if you don’t ask them.  I encourage you to contribute your comments and questions during class time—they will help all of us.  If you are not comfortable doing that, be sure and find some other avenue to regularly (e.g., office hours, email) have your questions answered (don’t wait until the last minute!).  If you never have questions, the quantity and/or quality of your studying is probably lacking.

5.       Be Specific When You Ask Questions:  “How do I do #4?” is a passive question that implies that I should do the work for you.  Take extra time preparing to be more specific in your questions—find out what part you do not understand, or tell me what you do know and work your way to what you do not know.  If you are specific, my help will help more; you will retain and understand better.  If you don’t prepare well enough to ask a specific question, my help won’t help as much as it could.


COURSE OUTLINE:

The following is, to the best of my ability, the order of material we will follow during the term.  Any deviations will be announced in class.

 

Monday, April 29:  The Transmission Mechanism for Monetary Policy

 

            The Basics (much of this is review from EC141 and/or EC342)

·         The Federal Funds Market (R. Glenn Hubbard, Money, the Financial System, and the Economy, p. 532-537)

·         The Yield Curve (Frederic Mishkin, The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets, p.137-148)

 

Tuesday, April 30:  The Natural Rate of Unemployment and the Nature of Inflation

 

            The Basics (continued)

·         The Money Supply Process (notes from EC141)

 

A Bit More Detail

·         Mishkin, (p. 651, 654-659)

·         Clark, Ch. 2 (p. 35-39)

·         Akhtar, Ch. 1 (p. 6-14)

·         Meulendyke, Ch. 8

 

            Defining Policy, Strategy, and Tactics (Class Notes)

 

Wednesday, May 1:  Expectations and the Fed’s Monetary Policy Goals in Review

 

            The Self-Regulating Economy

·         Aggregate Demand-Aggregate Supply Analysis (notes from EC141)

·         Mishkin (p. 620-627)

·         Clark, Ch. 1 (p. 14-15)

 

The Federal Reserve View

·         *William Poole.  “Inflation Hawk=Employment Dove.”  Speech given 7/29/99 (email).

 

            “Persistent Inflation is a Monetary Phenomenon”

·         Clark, Ch. 1 (p. 16-20) and Ch. 2 (p. 40-42)

·         Mishkin (p. 665, 667, 672-675)

 

The Federal Reserve View

·         *Gerald Dwyer and Ric Hafer.  “Are Money Growth and Inflation Still Related?”  Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review (Second Quarter 1999):  32-43.

 

            Theoretical Views on Inflation Expectations and Monetary Policy (Class Notes)

 

                        The Federal Reserve View

·         *Felix Brayton et al.  “The Role of Expectations in the FRB/US Macroeconomic Model.”  Federal Reserve Bulletin (April 1997):  227-245.  Read 227-230, try 235 and 238, and then read 243-245 (this is the most important part) (email).


Thursday, May 2:  Case Study of Fed Policy and the FOMC Meeting

 

THE Case Study of the Current Worldview and Policy Goals of the Fed:  The 1980-1982 Fight Against Inflation

·         Mishkin, p. 629-631

·         Clark, Ch. 4

 

The FOMC Meeting

·         Brief Overview of the Federal Reserve’s Structure (Class Notes)

·         Akhtar, Ch. 4

·         Meulendyke, Ch. 5

·         Examples of Past FOMC Statements

·         Video on FOMC Meeting

 

Friday, May 3:  Mock FOMC Meeting and Preparation for Chicago Trip

·         One Essay Question and one Write-up due today in class if not already handed in

·         Clark assignment due

·         Ch.1 (terms beginning with “long run aggregate supply schedule” and #5)

·         Ch. 2 (terms plus #2-5)

 

·         Another Clark assignment will be due Monday, May 13 by 5pm

·         Ch. 4 (terms plus #1, 2, 4)

 

            Mock FOMC Meeting

·         State of The Economy

·         Discussion and Vote

·         Policy Statement

 

Presentations for Chicago Trip

 

****  May 6 through May 10:  Chicago Trip ****

Preliminary Itinerary Follows Below After Course Outline

 

Monday, May 13:  Independence

·         Remember:  assignments due today by 5pm

 

Preparing Monetary Policy Objectives

·         Clark, Ch. 3

·         The Fed’s Monetary Policy Report to Congress from 2/27/02 (browse)

·         *Alan Blinder.  “Central Banking in a Democracy.”  Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly (Fall 1996):  1-14.  Excerpts.  This can be considered the Fed’s view, or close to it, since Blinder was on the Board of Governors shortly before the speech was given.

 

Alternative Views of the Fed’s Independence:

·         Miller and VanHoose.  Macroeconomics.  2nd Ed., 2001, p. 480-483.

·         *Thomas Palley.  “The Triumph of Wall Street.”  In Plenty of Nothing, Princeton University Press (1998):  104-125.


Tuesday, May 14:  Rules vs. Discretion

·         Clark assignment due

Ch. 3 (terms plus #2-5; for 3 and 4, you should be able to do without IS-LM; for 5, use this year’s ranges)

 

Rules vs. Discretion:  Lags and Uncertainties

·         Quick Review of the Traditional View of Money/Monetary Base Control (Class Notes)

·         Clark, Ch. 5 (through page 91)

·         *Milton Friedman.  “The Role of Monetary Policy.”  American Economic Review (March 1968):  1-17.  Read pages 11-17 (email).

 

Rules vs. Discretion:  Time Inconsistency and Credibility

·         Abel and Bernanke.  Macroeconomics.  4th Ed., 2001, p. 548-556.

 

Federal Reserve Reactions to Recent Crises

·         1998, Y2K (Class notes and handouts)

·         9/11:  *Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago 2001 Annual Report (http://www.chicagofed.org)

 

Wednesday, May 15:  Money Supply vs. Interest Rate Targets

·         Clark Assignment due

Ch. 5

Terms:  rule, discretion, model and policy uncertainty, constant growth rate rule, nonreactive rule, reactive rule, discretionary reactive tactics, fine tune

#1, 3, 4, 5

 

            Targets:  Operating, Intermediate, Policy Goals (Class notes and Clark, p. 91-95)

 

            The Money Supply vs. Interest Rate Targets Debate

·         Clark, Ch. 6

 

Thursday, May 16:  Experience with Money Supply Targets

·         Clark assignment due

Ch. 6, terms plus #2, 3, 5

 

The Fed’s 1979-1982 “Experiment with Monetarism”

·         Clark, Ch. 7

·         *Milton Friedman.  “Monetarism:  Lessons from the Post 1979 Experiment.”  American Economic Review (May 1984):  397-400 (email).

·         *Benjamin Friedman.  “Lessons from the 1979-1982 Monetary Policy Experiment.”  American Economic Review (May 1984):  382-387 (email).

 

Friday, May 17:  The Tactical Move to Flexible Targeting

·         Clark assignment due

Ch. 7, terms plus #2, 3 (explain why), 5

 

            Flexible Targeting

·         Clark, Ch. 8

·         M2 growth and targets since 1988

 

 

 

The Behavior of Velocity

·         The Quantity Theory of Money (Class notes)

·         Meulendyke, p. 12-16

·         Akhtar, p. 4-5

·         Federal Reserve Report to Congress on Velocity (current and/or past)

 

Monday, May 20:  Crafting a Strategy with Flexible Targeting

·         Clark assignment due

Ch. 8, terms plus #1, 2 (look at last few years of data)

 

Why is a Systematic Strategy Necessary?

 

Taylor’s Rule

·         Abel and Bernanke, p. 545

·         David Wessel.  “Could One Little Rule Explain Economics?”  The New York Times (February 7, 2000).

 

The True Believers

·         St. Louis Fed on Velocity (Handouts)

·         Poole and Jordan votes from 1998

·         *Bennett McCallum.  “Monetarist Rules in Light of Recent Experience.”  American Economic Review (May 1984):  388-391 (email).

·         McCallum’s Rule from St. Louis Fed’s Monetary Trends

 

Federal Reserve Views on Strategy under Flexible Targeting:

·         *Edward Gramlich.  “Monetary Rules.”  Speech given February 27, 1998.  For write-up, discuss the three types of rules (strengths and weaknesses).

·         *Laurence Meyer.  “The Strategy of Monetary Policy.”  Speech given March 16, 1998.  For write-up, pay most attention to the rules he discusses in the last few pages.  The first pages are simply laying the groundwork that we have already discussed in class.  Perhaps discuss how his rules can be interpreted through our discussion of Taylor’s Rule.

·         How the Fed sends “signals” to achieve transparency (Handouts)

 

Tuesday, May 21:  Soft Landings

 

            Theory and the First Attempt in the Late 1980s

·         Clark, Ch. 9

·         Video

 

Soft Landings in 1994-1995 (video) and 1999-2000 (Handouts and Video)

 

Alternative View

·         *L. Randall Wray.  “Why Does the Fed Want Slower Growth?”  Jerome Levy Economics Institute Policy Note 2000/7 (email).

 

Wednesday, May 22:  Managing the New Economy and/or Asset Price Bubble of the Late 1990s

·         Clark assignment due

Ch. 9,  terms plus the questions (1) under what circumstances would the Fed attempt a soft landing? (2) what is a soft landing?

 

            Handouts on the FOMC and the economy during the late 1990s

 

Preliminary Itinerary for Chicago Trip, May 6-10

 

Monday, May 6

9am                  Leave Wartburg

3pm                 Arrive Cass Hotel, 640 N Wabash Ave, Chicago, IL 60611

1-800-227-7850

 

Please note that for all visits there will be security checks and ID will be required.  No cameras or cell phones

 

Tuesday, May 7

9am                  Chicago Board of Trade

                        141 W Jackson Blvd

                        312-435-3590

 

11am                Chicago Board of Options Exchange

                        440 S LaSalle St

                        1-877-843-2263 (Janice Calvin)

 

2pm                 Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

                        230 S LaSalle St

                        312-322-2331 (Maggie)

 

330pm             Art Institute of Chicago

                        Recommended Tuesday because of free admission

                        111 S Michigan Avenue

 

Wednesday, May 8

9am                  Chicago Mercantile Exchange

                        30 S Wacker Dr 

312-930-1000

 

1pm                 Chicago Cubs vs. St. Louis Cardinals

                        Wrigley Field

 

Thursday, May 9

830am-            Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Conference on Bank Structure

140pm             and Competition

                        Fairmont Hotel, 200 North Columbus Drive

 

Registered for entire conference (including reception), so feel free to stay rest of day

 

Friday, May 10

8:30-10am       Chicago Fed Conference at Fairmont Hotel (Greenspan speech)

11am                Leave Chicago

6pm                 Arrive Wartburg